Resolving the Demo's Fiasco...
Heh, heh, what do we have here Boys and Girls?
Chickens coming home to roost?
A taste of their own medicine?
Another attempt to steal an election? Heck, they wrote the script after all.
Do we expect the leopard to shed its stripes?
Remember: It's not Bush who stole the 2000 election; it is Gore who tried to! It was Gore who sued. It was Gore who tried to selectively recount only highly democratic counties. It was Gore who tried to keep the military votes sealed. It was Gore's supporters who called an early close to the polls. The same supporters -- all the networks except FOX -- who called the exit polls for Gore. It was a Gore 100% Demogogue Florida Court that ruled illegally to re-write Florida's election laws -- just this one time -- and of course, in Gore's favor.
As we watch the Demogogues self-destruct today on TV, you are seeing history in the making. And it is here and now I am predicting this the beginning of their destruction -- mark my words -- POETIC JUSTICE rears it's gorgeous head. They have just sown the seeds from which springs HOPE eternal; but also, failure and disaster.
Robert Wexler, the Florida rep, eloquently made the case for "compromise" to allow one half of the votes that were illegally rigged in Hillary's favor, to be counted in Hillary's favor! Otherwise known as Demogogue justice.
Another example of the disingenuous Demogogue mindset. They will do to each other what they have done to their enemies. Not only will they defecate publicly and think it doesn't smell, they'll eat their own offsprings (former Demogogue Senator Joe Lieberman.)
Wexler knows quite well that anything less than 100% delegates counted for both states, Florida's and Michigan's -- one man, one vote rigged by Billary in Billary's favor in states where Obama was not even on the ballot -- will do absolutely no good for the insane half of the Bosnia veterans. Compromise?
Please tell that to the choir -- but they're not listening. They are singing.
The ramifications, as I stated above, will be long term and will NEVER BE FORGOTTEN by the screwed half of the Demogogue Party.
The two pathological liars, Hillary AND Obama, both believe they are entitled to the presidency. I think the world will make a few turns before that fateful day in November. Let me put it another way: Man plans; G-d laughs. Or Man proposes; G-d disposes.
No penalty will be allowed. This compromise is no compromise at all. It will be but a failed effort for these phoneys, phakes and phrauds to get to the convention in once piece, to shoehorn into office an already failed and lame duck one-term president just like Jimmy Carter; either the inexperienced and full of himself Empty Suit, Obama, who, surprisingly, is not alone in believing his own script that he voted against the war when he wasn't even in the Senate when the vote took place; or the equally inexperienced Bosnia warrior, the pathologically insane Hillary who will shortly go another round in taking down terrorists at the airport.
Now they are doing to each other, albeit not to the same degree, what they tried to do to Bush -- and failed to do. They just think they have succeeded. A finer show couldn't be had on TV...of course with the exception of the clicking of heels and the salute "I'm Reporting for Duty" at the last Demagogue Convention. That fellow too, thought he was "entitled. Have you heard of him lately?
As I said: POETIC JUSTICE....
surely too late....
but not denied.
In other words, it all comes back home.
KARMA.
Andrew G. Benjamin
Saturday, May 31, 2008
Friday, May 30, 2008
What Happened to Scott McClellan?
By Tony Vega
What drives so many in the Washington crowd? The short answer, Money, power, and ego, this remains consistent, regardless of ideology. So much so that integrity, honor, and loyalty are easily sold for those three coveted prizes and concepts.
Scott McClellan, the former press secretary for George W. Bush, demonstrated his lack of loyalty by selling his integrity, if he ever had any, to the George Soros crowd.
Scott McClellan's book, "What Happened" has been reported to be lacking substance and filled with regurgitated left wing talking points, that's about it, the same old same old. It's what it doesn't say that speaks volumes.
Scott McClellan, the former press secretary for George W. Bush, demonstrated his lack of loyalty by selling his integrity, if he ever had any, to the George Soros crowd.
Scott McClellan's book, "What Happened" has been reported to be lacking substance and filled with regurgitated left wing talking points, that's about it, the same old same old. It's what it doesn't say that speaks volumes.
Read here for the full story, and Bob Dole's scathing email: What Happened to Scott McClellan?
Labels:
scott mcclellan
Wednesday, May 28, 2008
Tuesday, May 27, 2008
Saturday, May 24, 2008
Tuesday, May 20, 2008
Barack Obama Defends Michelle Obama: "Lay Off My Wife"
By Tony Vega
May 20, 2008
After the Tennessee GOP aired a video ad featuring Michelle Obama uttering her most famous comments hinting to her lack of American pride, Barack Obama warned, “Lay off my wife.”[1]
Apparently, chivalry is not dead in the Obama camp, or is it? Not to long ago, in a bitter town, Barack Obama gave a "race" speech designed to control some of the damage stirred up by his mentor, the Rev. Wright. During this spin, Obama threw his grandmother under the bus by suggesting she held unfounded fears based on race, and later claimed she is a "typical white" person. Barack Obama attacked his “white” grandmother's character all in the pursuit of political gain. [2]
Barack Obama's treatment of his grandmother was and is shameful. While he was battering the lighter side of his family he was protecting his bitter wife and shrugging off alliances to the most radical and anti-American segments of American society. I am starting to doubt Louis Farrakhan's assessment that Barack Obama is "well groomed."[3] Barack Obama is simply enjoying the spoils of being the media’s darling.
It's rather simple Barack Obama, if your angry bride wishes to appear as your surrogate and attack America, then she is fair game. Perhaps sir, you need to thicken that skin of yours and save some chivalry for your grandmother.
Barack Obama has identified two individuals that have the greatest influence on his thinking; they are his wife Michelle Obama and Jeremiah A. Wright Jr. [4]
Barack did a miserable job at distancing himself from one anti-American "relative," let's take a quick look at some of the comments by his other "greatest influence."
1985, Princeton Thesis: "There was no doubt in my mind that as a member of the black community, I am obligated to this community and will utilize all of my present and future resources to benefit the black community first and foremost." -The future Mrs. Michelle Obama [5]
February 2008, UCLA: "before we can work on the problems, we have to fix our souls. Our souls are broken in this nation."-Michelle Obama [6]
February 2008, Milwaukee, Wisconsin: “People in this country are ready for change and hungry for a different kind of politics and …for the first time in my adult life I am proud of my country -Michelle Obama [7]
Mrs. Obama delivered an amended version of the speech later that day in Madison, Wis.
Madison, Wisconsin: “For the first time in my adult lifetime, I’m really proud of my country, not just because Barack has done well, but because I think people are hungry for change,”-Michelle Obama [7]
March 10th [2008] edition of The New Yorker: "we're a country that is just downright mean." -Michelle Obama [8]
The above is just a few "snippets" gleaned from larger speeches that Michelle Obama has given. The full context of those speeches will reveal an uglier version of the bride of Barack, one steeped in anger of monstrous proportions, Marxist ideals, and anti-American sentiment.
Ironically, when it was still politically expedient for Barack Obama to defend his "uncle", Barack complained that the media was only using "snippets" of the Reverend's speeches that he has delivered over the years. That complaint has prompted many to view those speeches in its entirety and what was revealed was hateful anti-American rhetoric, just in full context. The more Michelle Obama speaks it is apparent that she is a believer of the Reverend Wright's teachings.
Now that it is no longer politically healthy for Barack Obama to defend his "uncle", he has finally added some distance. Now, for the first time in his children's young lives there is hope that his daughters will have a change in doctrine. Well...there is still momma.
If Barack Obama wants the Tennessee GOP to lay off his wife, perhaps Michelle Obama should lay off America. Until then, Michelle Obama is fair game.
References
1. Youtube.com
2. Obama's Church Sale - Associated Content
3. Barack Obama's Church Honors Nation of Islam Leader Louis Farrakhan - Associated Content
4. RealClearPolitics - Articles - Who is Barack Obama?
5. Michelle Obama thesis was on racial divide - Jeffrey Ressner - Politico.com
6. Captain's Quarters
7. Michelle Obama Takes Heat for Saying She’s ‘Proud of My Country’ for the First Time - America’s Election HQ
8. Profiles: The Other Obama: Reporting & Essays: The New Yorker
May 20, 2008
After the Tennessee GOP aired a video ad featuring Michelle Obama uttering her most famous comments hinting to her lack of American pride, Barack Obama warned, “Lay off my wife.”[1]
Apparently, chivalry is not dead in the Obama camp, or is it? Not to long ago, in a bitter town, Barack Obama gave a "race" speech designed to control some of the damage stirred up by his mentor, the Rev. Wright. During this spin, Obama threw his grandmother under the bus by suggesting she held unfounded fears based on race, and later claimed she is a "typical white" person. Barack Obama attacked his “white” grandmother's character all in the pursuit of political gain. [2]
Barack Obama's treatment of his grandmother was and is shameful. While he was battering the lighter side of his family he was protecting his bitter wife and shrugging off alliances to the most radical and anti-American segments of American society. I am starting to doubt Louis Farrakhan's assessment that Barack Obama is "well groomed."[3] Barack Obama is simply enjoying the spoils of being the media’s darling.
It's rather simple Barack Obama, if your angry bride wishes to appear as your surrogate and attack America, then she is fair game. Perhaps sir, you need to thicken that skin of yours and save some chivalry for your grandmother.
Barack Obama has identified two individuals that have the greatest influence on his thinking; they are his wife Michelle Obama and Jeremiah A. Wright Jr. [4]
Barack did a miserable job at distancing himself from one anti-American "relative," let's take a quick look at some of the comments by his other "greatest influence."
1985, Princeton Thesis: "There was no doubt in my mind that as a member of the black community, I am obligated to this community and will utilize all of my present and future resources to benefit the black community first and foremost." -The future Mrs. Michelle Obama [5]
February 2008, UCLA: "before we can work on the problems, we have to fix our souls. Our souls are broken in this nation."-Michelle Obama [6]
February 2008, Milwaukee, Wisconsin: “People in this country are ready for change and hungry for a different kind of politics and …for the first time in my adult life I am proud of my country -Michelle Obama [7]
Mrs. Obama delivered an amended version of the speech later that day in Madison, Wis.
Madison, Wisconsin: “For the first time in my adult lifetime, I’m really proud of my country, not just because Barack has done well, but because I think people are hungry for change,”-Michelle Obama [7]
March 10th [2008] edition of The New Yorker: "we're a country that is just downright mean." -Michelle Obama [8]
The above is just a few "snippets" gleaned from larger speeches that Michelle Obama has given. The full context of those speeches will reveal an uglier version of the bride of Barack, one steeped in anger of monstrous proportions, Marxist ideals, and anti-American sentiment.
Ironically, when it was still politically expedient for Barack Obama to defend his "uncle", Barack complained that the media was only using "snippets" of the Reverend's speeches that he has delivered over the years. That complaint has prompted many to view those speeches in its entirety and what was revealed was hateful anti-American rhetoric, just in full context. The more Michelle Obama speaks it is apparent that she is a believer of the Reverend Wright's teachings.
Now that it is no longer politically healthy for Barack Obama to defend his "uncle", he has finally added some distance. Now, for the first time in his children's young lives there is hope that his daughters will have a change in doctrine. Well...there is still momma.
If Barack Obama wants the Tennessee GOP to lay off his wife, perhaps Michelle Obama should lay off America. Until then, Michelle Obama is fair game.
References
1. Youtube.com
2. Obama's Church Sale - Associated Content
3. Barack Obama's Church Honors Nation of Islam Leader Louis Farrakhan - Associated Content
4. RealClearPolitics - Articles - Who is Barack Obama?
5. Michelle Obama thesis was on racial divide - Jeffrey Ressner - Politico.com
6. Captain's Quarters
7. Michelle Obama Takes Heat for Saying She’s ‘Proud of My Country’ for the First Time - America’s Election HQ
8. Profiles: The Other Obama: Reporting & Essays: The New Yorker
Friday, May 16, 2008
The Difference
Author-Anonymous.
(Hat tip to CountryGirl)
John McCain and Hillary Clinton were walking down the street and came to a homeless person. The Republican, John McCain, gave him his business card and told him to come to his office for a job. He then took $20 out of his pocket and gave it to the homeless person. Hillary was impressed, so when they came to another homeless person, she stepped forward to help. She gave him directions to the welfare office, then reached into McCain's pocket and got out another $20. She kept $15 for administrative costs and gave the homeless person $5.
Now, do you understand the difference?
Thursday, May 15, 2008
Obama's 57 States of Confusion
Posted by Tony Vega
Hat tips to AGB and Ana Rebecca, two Great Americans.
Visit Ana's site here: proudinfidel.newsvine.com/
------------
Is Obama Smarter Than A 5th Grade Jaywalker? -- Doug Patton -- GOPUSA
Obama refuses to wear a [US] flag lapel pin because he thinks it is more patriotic to criticize his country than to support it, or even to wear a symbol of its support.
Obama thinks those of us out here in flyover country are all a bunch of bitter, gun-toting, Bible-thumping bigots furious at "those who don't look like us."
But wait. There's more. Just when we thought Obama had shot himself in the last foot he had available, he presents us with another gift.
On top LAPELGATE and PASTORGATE and BITTERGATE, now comes STATEGATE. It seems that the brilliant Barack Obama doesn't know how many states there are in our union. In an off-the-cuff statement you will not hear about on the nightly news, Obama declared that during his presidential campaign, he has visited 57 states. He also said that he has one more to visit: Alaska and Hawaii.
[Emphasis my own-AmericanAngle]
-------------
Gaffes occur. George Bush can provide enough material for entire episodes for SNL. Many of the uh...misspeaks can be rationalized. Doug Patton pointed out a few, namely this one, "At least when Quayle questioned the spelling of potato, he had some basis in fact for his inquiry: the plural of the word is "potatoes" - with an "e."
What is Barack Obama's basis in fact for claiming the USA has 57 states? Inquiring minds would like to know the root of Obama's Freudian slip...
Well, we do know there are 57 Islamic states.
-------------
Organisation of the Islamic Conference - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The Organisation of the Islamic Conference (OIC) is an international organization with a permanent delegation to the United Nations. It groups 57 nations, most of which are Islamic, from the Middle East, Africa, Central Asia, Caucasus, Balkan, Southeast Asia, South Asia and South America.
------------
How the Islamic states dominate the UN Human Rights Council International Humanist and Ethical Union
Every year from 1999 to 2005 the Organization of the Islamic Conference, representing the 57 ISLAMIC STATES, presented a resolution to the UN Commission on Human Rights, called “Combating Defamation of Religions”. While the text of the resolution referred to all religions the preamble made it clear that the sponsors’ concerns related primarily to one religion: Islam.
------------
Leaders of 57 Muslim countries criticize offensive cartoons in Mecca summit
Hassan Fattah
New York Times
2/10/2006
At Mecca Meeting, Cartoon Outrage Crystallized - New York Times
leaders of the world's 57 Muslim nations gathered for a summit meeting in Mecca in December, issues like religious extremism dominated the official agenda. But much of the talk in the hallways was of a wholly different issue: Danish cartoons satirizing the Prophet Muhammad..
Perhaps Obama was in a momentary state of confusion...or perhaps, he wasn't talking about American States at all...
Hat tips to AGB and Ana Rebecca, two Great Americans.
Visit Ana's site here: proudinfidel.newsvine.com/
------------
Is Obama Smarter Than A 5th Grade Jaywalker? -- Doug Patton -- GOPUSA
Obama refuses to wear a [US] flag lapel pin because he thinks it is more patriotic to criticize his country than to support it, or even to wear a symbol of its support.
Obama thinks those of us out here in flyover country are all a bunch of bitter, gun-toting, Bible-thumping bigots furious at "those who don't look like us."
But wait. There's more. Just when we thought Obama had shot himself in the last foot he had available, he presents us with another gift.
On top LAPELGATE and PASTORGATE and BITTERGATE, now comes STATEGATE. It seems that the brilliant Barack Obama doesn't know how many states there are in our union. In an off-the-cuff statement you will not hear about on the nightly news, Obama declared that during his presidential campaign, he has visited 57 states. He also said that he has one more to visit: Alaska and Hawaii.
[Emphasis my own-AmericanAngle]
-------------
Gaffes occur. George Bush can provide enough material for entire episodes for SNL. Many of the uh...misspeaks can be rationalized. Doug Patton pointed out a few, namely this one, "At least when Quayle questioned the spelling of potato, he had some basis in fact for his inquiry: the plural of the word is "potatoes" - with an "e."
What is Barack Obama's basis in fact for claiming the USA has 57 states? Inquiring minds would like to know the root of Obama's Freudian slip...
Well, we do know there are 57 Islamic states.
-------------
Organisation of the Islamic Conference - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The Organisation of the Islamic Conference (OIC) is an international organization with a permanent delegation to the United Nations. It groups 57 nations, most of which are Islamic, from the Middle East, Africa, Central Asia, Caucasus, Balkan, Southeast Asia, South Asia and South America.
------------
How the Islamic states dominate the UN Human Rights Council International Humanist and Ethical Union
Every year from 1999 to 2005 the Organization of the Islamic Conference, representing the 57 ISLAMIC STATES, presented a resolution to the UN Commission on Human Rights, called “Combating Defamation of Religions”. While the text of the resolution referred to all religions the preamble made it clear that the sponsors’ concerns related primarily to one religion: Islam.
------------
Leaders of 57 Muslim countries criticize offensive cartoons in Mecca summit
Hassan Fattah
New York Times
2/10/2006
At Mecca Meeting, Cartoon Outrage Crystallized - New York Times
leaders of the world's 57 Muslim nations gathered for a summit meeting in Mecca in December, issues like religious extremism dominated the official agenda. But much of the talk in the hallways was of a wholly different issue: Danish cartoons satirizing the Prophet Muhammad..
Perhaps Obama was in a momentary state of confusion...or perhaps, he wasn't talking about American States at all...
Labels:
barack obama,
Islam,
us elections
Sunday, May 11, 2008
Liberal Jews Will Never Learn
By Andrew G. Benjamin
Liberal Jews (meaning most Jews) will never learn from past mistakes or from their own delusions. Even if evidence slapped them in the face.
http://americanangle.blogspot.com/2008/04/jimmy-carters-recent-trip-to-meet-hamas.html
They might remember Andy Young's meeting with Arafat's people at the UN in the 70's. Jimmy Carter disowned any part in that illegal meeting. Today, Jimmy-Boy's own actions meeting with Hamas, 30 years later, belie his past denials in the Young affair; and his true sentiments as an ex-President for Sale for the Arab Lobby. (Proof below.)
Isn't it ironic how the libs disingenuously and cavalierly charge George Bush with having had too-close ties to the Saudis, while are either ignorant or forgiving of Carter's true lies after The Carter Center having had received tens of millions from Arabs? For which, BTW, 14 directors of the Center quit!
History repeats itself, but maybe not exactly the same way. And our liberal Jews will never learn who their true friends are as they make common cause with the very people who are planning to hurt them. -- AGB
---------------------------
HAMAS-LINK ADVISER AXED
By TOM LIDDY
May 10, 2008 -- Barack Obama has dumped one of his advisers for meeting with the Palestinian terrorist group Hamas, according to published reports.
Robert Malley, who acted as an informal adviser to Obama on Mideast policy, told the Times of London that he was in regular contact with the militant group as part of his work for the International Crisis Group think tank.
--------------------------
For background:
"Journalist Jacob Laksin has documented the tens of millions of dollars that the Carter Center has accepted from Saudi Arabian royalty and assorted other Middle Eastern sultans, who, in return, Carter dutifully praised as peaceful and tolerant (no matter how despotic the regime). And these are only the confirmed, public donations. ..."
http://www.gather.com/viewArticle.jsp?articleId=281474976879837
Liberal Jews (meaning most Jews) will never learn from past mistakes or from their own delusions. Even if evidence slapped them in the face.
http://americanangle.blogspot.com/2008/04/jimmy-carters-recent-trip-to-meet-hamas.html
They might remember Andy Young's meeting with Arafat's people at the UN in the 70's. Jimmy Carter disowned any part in that illegal meeting. Today, Jimmy-Boy's own actions meeting with Hamas, 30 years later, belie his past denials in the Young affair; and his true sentiments as an ex-President for Sale for the Arab Lobby. (Proof below.)
Isn't it ironic how the libs disingenuously and cavalierly charge George Bush with having had too-close ties to the Saudis, while are either ignorant or forgiving of Carter's true lies after The Carter Center having had received tens of millions from Arabs? For which, BTW, 14 directors of the Center quit!
History repeats itself, but maybe not exactly the same way. And our liberal Jews will never learn who their true friends are as they make common cause with the very people who are planning to hurt them. -- AGB
---------------------------
HAMAS-LINK ADVISER AXED
By TOM LIDDY
May 10, 2008 -- Barack Obama has dumped one of his advisers for meeting with the Palestinian terrorist group Hamas, according to published reports.
Robert Malley, who acted as an informal adviser to Obama on Mideast policy, told the Times of London that he was in regular contact with the militant group as part of his work for the International Crisis Group think tank.
--------------------------
For background:
"Journalist Jacob Laksin has documented the tens of millions of dollars that the Carter Center has accepted from Saudi Arabian royalty and assorted other Middle Eastern sultans, who, in return, Carter dutifully praised as peaceful and tolerant (no matter how despotic the regime). And these are only the confirmed, public donations. ..."
http://www.gather.com/viewArticle.jsp?articleId=281474976879837
Tuesday, May 6, 2008
Stupid is as Stupid Does: Tom Hanks Endorses Barack Obama
By Tony Vega for AmericanAngle
May 05, 2008
Reported from Durham, NC and in through the wires comes a ringing endorsement for Barack Obama by Tom Hanks.
Whenever a celebrity from the left coast gives a political endorsement or social idea, hide the children.
There have been some great celebrities and social giants that emerged from Hollywood, so to be fair the broad brush will be holstered.
It’s not just wacky thespians such as Rosie O’Donnell that should stick to reading scripts. Well-respected and talented stars, such as Mr. Hanks, have wandered into the political arena. It would be nice to see them wander back out. I completely support their right to express their political views. However, the danger is the soapbox that they are instantly afforded due to their fame and it is far too often that ideology trumps sincerity. Moreover, the sheep can get lost by star gazing distractions. This is very notable among many Barack Obama supporters.
Additionally, it would be nice to see Chuck Norris stick to the roundhouse kicks and impressive punches than stumping along campaign trails and trying to read from Teleprompters. I don't know what's more painful a Norris Karate chop or listening to his attempts at prolific commentary whether it's substituting as a FOX pundit or butchering his way along a campaign trail, we may never know. Perhaps, Mike Huckabee has the answer to that one.
Tom Hanks donated 10 grand to Slick Willie's legal defense fund, and then admitted regretting doing so. This is another example of ideology trumping common sense.
Fast forward to today's political scene and we have the same Tom Hanks, another Clinton, and a dazzling new comer. Oh yeah, and a patriotic war hero.
It looks like Tom Hanks hedged his bets this time around and decided the smart money might be behind Barack Obama instead of another Clinton.
The cringe factor comes when the Forrest Gump star claims he is supporting Barack Obama, in part, due to Obama's "character" and "vision." Mr. Hanks also attributes “integrity” to Barack Obama’s “inspirational” efforts to “unify.” Tom Hanks delivered this with a straight face. Kudos for another Oscar winning performance. Mr. Hanks, you should have started and stopped with “inspirational”
Tom Hanks are you serious or acting? Maybe you‘re seriously acting. It could be that Mr. Hanks was reading his Barack Obama endorsement script through rosy colored lenses.
The most sincere part of Tom Hanks’ endorsement message was this comedic quip, “As an official celebrity, I know my endorsement has just made my mind up for you.”
Stupid is as stupid does.
Monday, May 5, 2008
Sean Bell and His Boys
An addition to the article, "Queens Tolls the Bell of Justice"
by Tony Vega
Just in case you missed it, published here and on AC is an honest look into the acquittal of the three NYPD officers unjustly prosecuted for the shooting death of Sean Bell and the wounding of two other men with known criminal histories.
Included for your perusal is a laundry list of crimes Sean Bell, Joseph Guzman, and Trent Benefield were arrested for. List is not exhaustive.
The list was sent to the author anonymously and is widely circulated on the web.
Sean Bell and His Boys:
Queens Tolls the Bell of Justice
The Sean Bell verdict was handed down Friday, proclaiming three NYPD officers not-guilty in the police shooting death of an armed 23-year-old Queens man.
That’s right folks you read that right, an “armed” man. That man was Sean Bell and he was armed and fully loaded with booze and a 3000-pound vehicle. Sean Bell struck a NYC police detective and a police vehicle.
The rules of engagement and justification laws are clear as defined by The NYS Penal Code. The use of deadly physical force (DPF) is necessary to defend the police officer or another person from what the officer reasonably believes to be the use or imminent use of DPF.
Full Story: Queens Tolls the Bell of Justice
by Tony Vega
Just in case you missed it, published here and on AC is an honest look into the acquittal of the three NYPD officers unjustly prosecuted for the shooting death of Sean Bell and the wounding of two other men with known criminal histories.
Included for your perusal is a laundry list of crimes Sean Bell, Joseph Guzman, and Trent Benefield were arrested for. List is not exhaustive.
The list was sent to the author anonymously and is widely circulated on the web.
Sean Bell and His Boys:
Queens Tolls the Bell of Justice
The Sean Bell verdict was handed down Friday, proclaiming three NYPD officers not-guilty in the police shooting death of an armed 23-year-old Queens man.
That’s right folks you read that right, an “armed” man. That man was Sean Bell and he was armed and fully loaded with booze and a 3000-pound vehicle. Sean Bell struck a NYC police detective and a police vehicle.
The rules of engagement and justification laws are clear as defined by The NYS Penal Code. The use of deadly physical force (DPF) is necessary to defend the police officer or another person from what the officer reasonably believes to be the use or imminent use of DPF.
Full Story: Queens Tolls the Bell of Justice
Sunday, May 4, 2008
Photo Journal: Lies, Libel, Defamation, & Stealing Wives
Compiled by Andrew G. Benjamin
Hey, no one's perfect! Mi Casa; su Casa & Your wife is my wife. We share the wealth.- Rev. Wright
http://www.nypost.com/seven/05042008/news/nationalnews/baracks_rev__stole_a_wife_109298.htm
On the way to "G-d DAMN America!"
This 10,000 square foot mansion is being built for the Rev. with Church Money, a showcase to demonstrate to all victims of The White Devil how utterly miserable life in America can be for the poor African - American America-haters:
Isn't it ironic that the genuine racists, professional victims, haters and the irrational resentment-filled call those who point out these truths "RACISTS?" Actually, no. They have no idea what Socrates meant when he said: "Know Thyself." And they won't bother to find out either.
Talking about hypocrisy? LETS!
I have a Dream!
THE LEGACY
GIVING FOR HOPE.
Remember what the Rev. said: "We brought it on ourselves."
"I never heard my Reverend Wright say anything racist
or bad about America and I approve this message."
It is suggested, when you watch a magician, watch the hand that is NOT moving.
Smoke and Mirrors and Snake Oil.
Or better yet:
PIGS THAT FLY
Hey, no one's perfect! Mi Casa; su Casa & Your wife is my wife. We share the wealth.- Rev. Wright
http://www.nypost.com/seven/05042008/news/nationalnews/baracks_rev__stole_a_wife_109298.htm
On the way to "G-d DAMN America!"
This 10,000 square foot mansion is being built for the Rev. with Church Money, a showcase to demonstrate to all victims of The White Devil how utterly miserable life in America can be for the poor African - American America-haters:
Isn't it ironic that the genuine racists, professional victims, haters and the irrational resentment-filled call those who point out these truths "RACISTS?" Actually, no. They have no idea what Socrates meant when he said: "Know Thyself." And they won't bother to find out either.
Talking about hypocrisy? LETS!
I have a Dream!
THE LEGACY
GIVING FOR HOPE.
Remember what the Rev. said: "We brought it on ourselves."
"I never heard my Reverend Wright say anything racist
or bad about America and I approve this message."
It is suggested, when you watch a magician, watch the hand that is NOT moving.
Smoke and Mirrors and Snake Oil.
Or better yet:
PIGS THAT FLY
Saturday, May 3, 2008
Female 911 Caller Ignored and Killed
Ladies, someone breaking in your home, just call 911!
By Andrew G. Benjamin
Ladies, students, and anti-gun people. Listen up.
CASE LAW SPECIFICALLY INDEMNIFIES THE POLICE FROM LIABILITY TO PROTECT THE CITIZEN. IN OTHER WORDS, THE POLICE DON'T HAVE TO PROTECT YOU, BECAUSE THEY ARE NOT LEGALLY REQUIRED TO.
One of many examples, that YOU are the only one You can count on:
Unarmed Female 911 Caller Ignored and Killed
Stay Safe,
Andrew
WHICH WOULD YOU RATHER HAVE?
THIS?
OR THIS?
INSTRUCTIONS: As the rapist is about to slit your throat ear-to-ear with your own serrated kitchen knife, get your key ring out of your purse and threaten him with it.
OR THIS?
WHICH DO YOU THINK WILL SAVE YOUR FINE ASS?
"A fear of weapons is a sign of retarded sexual and emotional maturity." -- General Introduction to Psychoanalysis. – Sigmund Freud
REMEMBER GIRLS: IT IS YOU ALONE WHO IS RESPONSIBLE FOR YOUR LIVES. THE POLICE COME ONLY TO CLEAN UP THE MESS AND WRITE THE REPORT. IT IS NOT THE GUN YOU NEED TO FEAR. IT IS WOMEN WITH GUNS WHOM THEY NEED TO FEAR. THE 90 LB WOMAN WITH A GUN WILL STOP A 220 LB. RAPIST ANIMAL! RIGHT IN HIS TRACKS. VOTE FOR THOSE PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATES WHO WILL ALLOW YOU THE MEANS TO SELF DEFENSE.
THE TWO DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATES WANT TO TAKE YOUR GUNS...WHILE THE CRIMINAL WILL ALWAYS HAVE GUNS AND THE MEANS TO HARM YOU!
In U.S. v. Cruikshank (1876), the Court said the right for the citizen to possess and bear arms preexisted the Constitution. In Presser v. Illinois (1886), it said gun control cannot have the effect of disarming the citizenry. In U.S. v. Miller (1939), it said that the militia consists of individuals "bearing arms supplied by themselves." And in U.S. v. Verdugo-Urquidez (1980), it said "the people" means the same thing in the Second Amendment that it means everywhere else in the Constitution.
REFERENCES from The Federalist Papers:
"[W]hereas, to preserve liberty, it is essential that the whole
body of the people always possess arms, and be taught alike,
especially when young, how to use them; nor does it follow from
this, that all promiscuously must go into actual service on
every occasion. The mind that aims at a select militia must be
influenced by a truly anti-republican principle; and when we see
many men disposed to practice upon it, whenever they can prevail,
no wonder true republicans are for carefully guarding against it."
-- Federal Farmer (Antifederalist Letter, No.18, 25 January 1778)
Reference: The Complete Anti-Federalist, Storing,
ed., vol. 2 (342) The Founders Constitution
< http://press-pubs.uchicago.edu/founders/docu
Thomas Jefferson: "Let your gun be your constant companion on your walks... this gives exercise to the body and independence to the mind... no free man shall ever be debarred the use of guns"
Samuel Adams: "The Constitution shall never be construed to prevent the people of the United States who are peaceable citizens from keeping their own arms."
James Madison: "... The Constitution preserves "the advantage of being armed which Americans possess over the people of almost every other nation...(where) the governments are afraid to trust the people with arms."
Thomas Paine: "...arms discourage and keep the invader in awe, and preserve order in the world as well as property...Horrid mischief would ensue were the law-abiding deprived of the use of them."
John Adams: "Arms in the hands of individual citizens may be used at individual discretion...in private self defense."
Richard Henry Lee: "A militia when properly formed is in fact the people themselves...and include all men capable of bearing arms...To preserve liberty it is essential that the whole body of the people always possess arms..."
George Mason: "I ask Sir, what is the militia? It is the whole peopleI...to disarm the people is the best and most effective way to enslave them."
Thomas Jefferson: "A strong body makes the mind strong. As to the species of exercises, I advise the gun. While this gives moderate exercise to the body, it gives boldness, enterprise and independence to the mind. Games played with the ball, and others of that nature, are too violent for the body and stamp no character in the mind."
"Pacifism is a shifty doctrine under which a man accepts the benefits of the social group without being willing to pay; and claims a halo for his dishonesty."--Robert A. Heinlein
"A fear of weapons is a sign of retarded sexual and emotional maturity." -- General Introduction to Psychoanalysis. – Sigmund Freud
"Society has a right to erase from the roll of its members
anyone who rendered his own existence inconsistent with
theirs; to withdraw from him the protection of their laws;
and to remove from him the protection of their laws, and to
remove him from among them by exile, or even by death
if necessary." -- Thomas Jefferson 1815
By Andrew G. Benjamin
Ladies, students, and anti-gun people. Listen up.
CASE LAW SPECIFICALLY INDEMNIFIES THE POLICE FROM LIABILITY TO PROTECT THE CITIZEN. IN OTHER WORDS, THE POLICE DON'T HAVE TO PROTECT YOU, BECAUSE THEY ARE NOT LEGALLY REQUIRED TO.
One of many examples, that YOU are the only one You can count on:
Unarmed Female 911 Caller Ignored and Killed
Stay Safe,
Andrew
WHICH WOULD YOU RATHER HAVE?
THIS?
OR THIS?
INSTRUCTIONS: As the rapist is about to slit your throat ear-to-ear with your own serrated kitchen knife, get your key ring out of your purse and threaten him with it.
OR THIS?
WHICH DO YOU THINK WILL SAVE YOUR FINE ASS?
"A fear of weapons is a sign of retarded sexual and emotional maturity." -- General Introduction to Psychoanalysis. – Sigmund Freud
REMEMBER GIRLS: IT IS YOU ALONE WHO IS RESPONSIBLE FOR YOUR LIVES. THE POLICE COME ONLY TO CLEAN UP THE MESS AND WRITE THE REPORT. IT IS NOT THE GUN YOU NEED TO FEAR. IT IS WOMEN WITH GUNS WHOM THEY NEED TO FEAR. THE 90 LB WOMAN WITH A GUN WILL STOP A 220 LB. RAPIST ANIMAL! RIGHT IN HIS TRACKS. VOTE FOR THOSE PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATES WHO WILL ALLOW YOU THE MEANS TO SELF DEFENSE.
THE TWO DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATES WANT TO TAKE YOUR GUNS...WHILE THE CRIMINAL WILL ALWAYS HAVE GUNS AND THE MEANS TO HARM YOU!
In U.S. v. Cruikshank (1876), the Court said the right for the citizen to possess and bear arms preexisted the Constitution. In Presser v. Illinois (1886), it said gun control cannot have the effect of disarming the citizenry. In U.S. v. Miller (1939), it said that the militia consists of individuals "bearing arms supplied by themselves." And in U.S. v. Verdugo-Urquidez (1980), it said "the people" means the same thing in the Second Amendment that it means everywhere else in the Constitution.
REFERENCES from The Federalist Papers:
"[W]hereas, to preserve liberty, it is essential that the whole
body of the people always possess arms, and be taught alike,
especially when young, how to use them; nor does it follow from
this, that all promiscuously must go into actual service on
every occasion. The mind that aims at a select militia must be
influenced by a truly anti-republican principle; and when we see
many men disposed to practice upon it, whenever they can prevail,
no wonder true republicans are for carefully guarding against it."
-- Federal Farmer (Antifederalist Letter, No.18, 25 January 1778)
Reference: The Complete Anti-Federalist, Storing,
ed., vol. 2 (342) The Founders Constitution
< http://press-pubs.uchicago.edu/founders/docu
Thomas Jefferson: "Let your gun be your constant companion on your walks... this gives exercise to the body and independence to the mind... no free man shall ever be debarred the use of guns"
Samuel Adams: "The Constitution shall never be construed to prevent the people of the United States who are peaceable citizens from keeping their own arms."
James Madison: "... The Constitution preserves "the advantage of being armed which Americans possess over the people of almost every other nation...(where) the governments are afraid to trust the people with arms."
Thomas Paine: "...arms discourage and keep the invader in awe, and preserve order in the world as well as property...Horrid mischief would ensue were the law-abiding deprived of the use of them."
John Adams: "Arms in the hands of individual citizens may be used at individual discretion...in private self defense."
Richard Henry Lee: "A militia when properly formed is in fact the people themselves...and include all men capable of bearing arms...To preserve liberty it is essential that the whole body of the people always possess arms..."
George Mason: "I ask Sir, what is the militia? It is the whole peopleI...to disarm the people is the best and most effective way to enslave them."
Thomas Jefferson: "A strong body makes the mind strong. As to the species of exercises, I advise the gun. While this gives moderate exercise to the body, it gives boldness, enterprise and independence to the mind. Games played with the ball, and others of that nature, are too violent for the body and stamp no character in the mind."
"Pacifism is a shifty doctrine under which a man accepts the benefits of the social group without being willing to pay; and claims a halo for his dishonesty."--Robert A. Heinlein
"A fear of weapons is a sign of retarded sexual and emotional maturity." -- General Introduction to Psychoanalysis. – Sigmund Freud
"Society has a right to erase from the roll of its members
anyone who rendered his own existence inconsistent with
theirs; to withdraw from him the protection of their laws;
and to remove from him the protection of their laws, and to
remove him from among them by exile, or even by death
if necessary." -- Thomas Jefferson 1815
Thursday, May 1, 2008
Queens Tolls the Bell of Justice
By Tony Vega
The Sean Bell verdict was handed down Friday, proclaiming three NYPD officers not- guilty in the police shooting death of an armed 23-year-old Queens man.
That’s right folks you read that right, an “armed” man. That man was Sean Bell and he was armed and fully loaded with booze and a 3000-pound vehicle. Sean Bell struck a NYC police detective and a police vehicle.
The rules of engagement and justification laws are clear as defined by The NYS Penal Code. The use of deadly physical force (DPF) is necessary to defend the police officer or another person from what the officer reasonably believes to be the use or imminent use of DPF.
A 3000-pound vehicle when used as a weapon qualifies as DPF, particularly in addition to verbal statements from the Bell party referencing to “gat” and “Yo, get my gun, get my gun.” The totality of these events would lead a reasonable person in this circumstance to reasonably believe that the use of DPF is imminent and/or in fact being used, be it by the vehicle or firearm.
NYPD rules may dictate that an officer not utilize DPF against a moving vehicle unless DPF from other than the vehicle is being utilized (ex. someone shooting from inside the vehicle) this does not supersede State law.
Sean Bell by the nature of his lifestyle essentially committed suicide via police, certainly a tragic scenario. The actions of his chosen revelers namely Joseph Guzman and Trent Benefield also heavily contributed to the death of Sean Bell as well as to their own sustained injuries.
Mr. Guzman was reportedly engaged in a dispute with a female inside the social club. As Bell’s friends left the scene one of them uttered, “Yo, get my gun and kill that dumb white bitch.” Undercover officers investigating a prostitution ring at the seedy establishment overheard this.
Mr. Bell had a past record for illegally possessing a firearm and allegedly sold drugs two months prior to the shooting. Joseph Guzman and Trent Benefield, who were also shot in the incident, had been arrested numerous times for illegal firearm possession and drug sales. Guzman has spent approximately 5-years in prison. After the incident Mr. Benefield continued on his violent path and allegedly assaulted his pregnant girlfriend, he was ordered to attend behavioral counseling.
The tragedy on November 25, 2006 did not end with the life of Sean Bell. It was a tragic loss of justice when three NYPD officers were arrested and prosecuted for those events; Police officers that have sworn to defend the very city that failed to defend them.
Police officers that enjoyed good employment records and reputations were excoriated in the media and the courts. American men that held honorable jobs and families, men that were pursuing the American dream, men that were innocent of criminal behavior. These men happened to be Americans of color, but their positive and productive lifestyles were in direct contrast to the negative and criminal lifestyles to the men of color that earned NYC’s sympathy and Al Sharpton‘s support. Once again, Mr. Sharpton marched for the wrong cause. The acquittal was justice served.
The actions of all police officers should be scrutinized. Police officers hold a tremendous amount of public trust and power. Scrutiny and a higher standard should be expected and demanded. Political prosecution and pandering should never enter the arena. A proverbial quote comes to mind, “the difference between the way things are and the way they should be, will drive a sensitive man crazy.” I pray that these officers maintain their strength and courage.
It is shameful and tragic that Al Sharpton is given a stage to polarize NYC in order to further his pitiful agenda. Shameful and tragic not only because main stream folks allow a race arsonist to line his pockets on the backs of the very people he claims to represent, but what is ignored as a result. Actual crimes and the loss of innocent human life that occurs every day on the mean streets of NY and elsewhere are ignored. Black on black crime is a reality that rips apart families across America. The silence of the Sharptons of the world is deafening. Personal responsibility and empowerment are put aside and ignored.
Al Sharpton has a proven track record of fanning the flames of racial unrest. If he were a fire fighter, he would respond and fight the fire with gasoline. When Barack Obama cautioned restraint and correctly stated that violence in response to the verdict will be counter productive, Al Sharpton scoffed. Sharpton reportedly claimed that Obama was merely “grandstanding in front of white people” I wonder if they were “typical white people.” What say you Barack?
Al Sharpton has continued to champion causes where the “victims” have falsely accused innocent people and caused irreparable damage to careers, lives, and families. The Tawana Brawley case and the Duke Lacrosse case are two notable examples. It is sad that the silence of the Sharptons of the world is expected and apologies are not.
Assaults upon and murders of police officers, including officers of color, are reported in the newspapers and forgotten. The silence of the Sharptons of the world is accepted.
When are the police officers going to march?
The Sean Bell verdict was handed down Friday, proclaiming three NYPD officers not- guilty in the police shooting death of an armed 23-year-old Queens man.
That’s right folks you read that right, an “armed” man. That man was Sean Bell and he was armed and fully loaded with booze and a 3000-pound vehicle. Sean Bell struck a NYC police detective and a police vehicle.
The rules of engagement and justification laws are clear as defined by The NYS Penal Code. The use of deadly physical force (DPF) is necessary to defend the police officer or another person from what the officer reasonably believes to be the use or imminent use of DPF.
A 3000-pound vehicle when used as a weapon qualifies as DPF, particularly in addition to verbal statements from the Bell party referencing to “gat” and “Yo, get my gun, get my gun.” The totality of these events would lead a reasonable person in this circumstance to reasonably believe that the use of DPF is imminent and/or in fact being used, be it by the vehicle or firearm.
NYPD rules may dictate that an officer not utilize DPF against a moving vehicle unless DPF from other than the vehicle is being utilized (ex. someone shooting from inside the vehicle) this does not supersede State law.
Sean Bell by the nature of his lifestyle essentially committed suicide via police, certainly a tragic scenario. The actions of his chosen revelers namely Joseph Guzman and Trent Benefield also heavily contributed to the death of Sean Bell as well as to their own sustained injuries.
Mr. Guzman was reportedly engaged in a dispute with a female inside the social club. As Bell’s friends left the scene one of them uttered, “Yo, get my gun and kill that dumb white bitch.” Undercover officers investigating a prostitution ring at the seedy establishment overheard this.
Mr. Bell had a past record for illegally possessing a firearm and allegedly sold drugs two months prior to the shooting. Joseph Guzman and Trent Benefield, who were also shot in the incident, had been arrested numerous times for illegal firearm possession and drug sales. Guzman has spent approximately 5-years in prison. After the incident Mr. Benefield continued on his violent path and allegedly assaulted his pregnant girlfriend, he was ordered to attend behavioral counseling.
The tragedy on November 25, 2006 did not end with the life of Sean Bell. It was a tragic loss of justice when three NYPD officers were arrested and prosecuted for those events; Police officers that have sworn to defend the very city that failed to defend them.
Police officers that enjoyed good employment records and reputations were excoriated in the media and the courts. American men that held honorable jobs and families, men that were pursuing the American dream, men that were innocent of criminal behavior. These men happened to be Americans of color, but their positive and productive lifestyles were in direct contrast to the negative and criminal lifestyles to the men of color that earned NYC’s sympathy and Al Sharpton‘s support. Once again, Mr. Sharpton marched for the wrong cause. The acquittal was justice served.
The actions of all police officers should be scrutinized. Police officers hold a tremendous amount of public trust and power. Scrutiny and a higher standard should be expected and demanded. Political prosecution and pandering should never enter the arena. A proverbial quote comes to mind, “the difference between the way things are and the way they should be, will drive a sensitive man crazy.” I pray that these officers maintain their strength and courage.
It is shameful and tragic that Al Sharpton is given a stage to polarize NYC in order to further his pitiful agenda. Shameful and tragic not only because main stream folks allow a race arsonist to line his pockets on the backs of the very people he claims to represent, but what is ignored as a result. Actual crimes and the loss of innocent human life that occurs every day on the mean streets of NY and elsewhere are ignored. Black on black crime is a reality that rips apart families across America. The silence of the Sharptons of the world is deafening. Personal responsibility and empowerment are put aside and ignored.
Al Sharpton has a proven track record of fanning the flames of racial unrest. If he were a fire fighter, he would respond and fight the fire with gasoline. When Barack Obama cautioned restraint and correctly stated that violence in response to the verdict will be counter productive, Al Sharpton scoffed. Sharpton reportedly claimed that Obama was merely “grandstanding in front of white people” I wonder if they were “typical white people.” What say you Barack?
Al Sharpton has continued to champion causes where the “victims” have falsely accused innocent people and caused irreparable damage to careers, lives, and families. The Tawana Brawley case and the Duke Lacrosse case are two notable examples. It is sad that the silence of the Sharptons of the world is expected and apologies are not.
Assaults upon and murders of police officers, including officers of color, are reported in the newspapers and forgotten. The silence of the Sharptons of the world is accepted.
When are the police officers going to march?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)